| Version 9 (modified by jazz, 16 years ago) (diff) |
|---|
XEN Web-based Manager
1.Introduction
Our GTD-Cloud is done, but it need convenient control mechanism through web (http protocol). We survey two Web-based manager, and choose which is suit for Cloud environment.
2. Comparison
| Enomaly | OpenQRM | |
| Features | ||
| Host OS | Centos, RHEL 5.2,Ubuntu 8.04 | Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Fedora 9 & openSuse |
| Client OS Image | Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Fedora 9 & openSuse | |
| Hypervisior | Xen, KVM, Vmware | VMware, Xen, KVM, Linux-VServer |
| Functions | ||
| i18n (Chinese?) | ||
| License | AGPL | GPLv3 |
| Monitoring Tool | Nagios | Nagios |
| High-availability | No | Supported |
| Virtual Network Manager | Supported | |
| Amazon EC2 support | Yes | No |
3. Idea
- 目前Survey Enomaly和OpenQRM的結果：
- 以功能面來說OpenQRM提供更多的功能(採用plug-able的架構)，此外OpenQRM也整合了一些Storage的方案
- 以HA來看，OpenQRM有提供faul-over的機制
- 以控制介面來看，Enomaly的介面較簡單直覺
- 根據我們的需求來看，
- 之後會繼續實際安裝和操作來了解其真正的差別
4. Reference
5. ScreenCast
Attachments (1)
- SF_Distibuted_Computing.jpg (200.2 KB) - added by jazz 16 years ago.
Download all attachments as: .zip
