XEN Web-based Manager
1.Introduction
Our GTD-Cloud is done, but it need convenient control mechanism through web (http protocol). We survey two Web-based manager, and choose which is suit for Cloud environment.
2. Comparison
| Enomaly | OpenQRM | |
| Features | ||
| Host OS | Centos, RHEL 5.2,Ubuntu 8.04 | Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Fedora 9 & openSuse |
| Client OS Image | Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Fedora 9 & openSuse | |
| Hypervisior | Xen, KVM, Vmware | VMware, Xen, KVM, Linux-VServer |
| Functions | ||
| i18n (Chinese?) | ||
| License | AGPL | GPLv3 |
| Monitoring Tool | Nagios | Nagios |
| High-availability | No | Supported |
| Virtual Network Manager | Supported | |
| Amazon EC2 support | Yes | No |
3. Idea
- 目前 Survey Enomaly 和 OpenQRM 的結果：
- 以功能面來說 OpenQRM 提供更多的功能(採用plug-able的架構)，此外 OpenQRM 也整合了一些 Storage 的方案
- 以 HA 來看， OpenQRM 有提供 faul-over 的機制
- Enomaly 可讓使用者依需求客製 VM image template，並提供 VM 印象檔打包的功能
- 以使用者觀點的兩者比較：
| Enomaly | OpenQRM | |
| 外觀 | 美觀 | 簡單直覺 |
| 操作性 | 好用 | |
| 安裝性 | 易 | |
| 支援 Cluster 佈署 | 有 | |
| 客制 OS images | 有 |
4. Reference
5. ScreenCast
Last modified 16 years ago
Last modified on Mar 6, 2009, 3:41:18 PM
Attachments (1)
- SF_Distibuted_Computing.jpg (200.2 KB) - added by jazz 16 years ago.
Download all attachments as: .zip
