Version 3 (modified by chris, 17 years ago) (diff) |
---|
Lustre Performance Report (Uses iozone command)
0. Machine Informance
Node | 4 nodes (1 server , 3 client provide disks) |
CPU | Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (each node) |
Memory | 2GB DDR2 667 (each node) |
Disk | 320G+160G (each node), All nodes: (320G+ 160G) * 3 = 1.4T |
NIC | Intel Corporation 82566DM Gigabit Network Connection |
Switch | ZyXEL GE switch |
1. 4 Nodes, No Replicate, Adjust Parameters
$ iozone -g 16g -aRb test.wks
3. Performance
The following six diagrams show the testing results using IOzone as the benchmark to evaluate how Lustre works with and without data-replication. The six IO operations we have done for performance evaluation are write, re-write, read, re-read, random read, and random write opertion, respectively.
Attachments (7)
- re-write.PNG (52.7 KB) - added by chris 17 years ago.
- reader.PNG (50.2 KB) - added by chris 17 years ago.
- re-reader.PNG (54.0 KB) - added by chris 17 years ago.
- random-reader.PNG (53.3 KB) - added by chris 17 years ago.
- random-write.PNG (54.1 KB) - added by chris 17 years ago.
- write.PNG (48.2 KB) - added by chris 17 years ago.
- lustre_iozone_16GB_single.xls (43.0 KB) - added by chris 17 years ago.
Download all attachments as: .zip