close Warning: Can't synchronize with repository "(default)" (Unsupported version control system "svn": /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/libsvn/_fs.so: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory). Look in the Trac log for more information.

Changes between Version 22 and Version 23 of KVM_vs_Xen


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 20, 2010, 7:04:20 PM (14 years ago)
Author:
rider
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • KVM_vs_Xen

    v22 v23  
    3737= 【測試案例】 =
    3838== [1. CPU 效能比較] ==
    39 ||                    || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVN''' || '''KVM''' ||
     39||                    || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVM''' || '''KVM''' ||
    4040|| '''VMmark'''       ||   ||  ||  ||
    41 || '''dbench'''       ||   ||  ||  ||
    4241|| '''Phoronix Test Suite'''      ||   ||  ||  ||
     42'''vm01 規格''' = 1CPU + 4GB HD + 1GB RAM + 128MB SWAP
    4343
    4444[[BR]]
    4545== [2. Memory 效能比較] ==
    46 ||               || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVN''' || '''KVM''' ||
    47 || '''Cachebench'''    ||   ||  ||  ||
     46||               || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVM''' || '''KVM''' ||
    4847|| '''Phoronix Test Suite'''      ||   ||  ||  ||
     48'''vm01 規格''' = 1CPU + 4GB HD + 1GB RAM + 128MB SWAP
    4949
    5050[[BR]]
    5151== [3. Graphics 效能比較] ==
    5252  * [http://trac.nchc.org.tw/grid/attachment/wiki/KVM_vs_Xen/Direct%20Access%20to%20Graphics%20Card%20Leveraging%20VT-d%20Technical%20Report.pdf Direct Access to Graphics Card Leveraging VT-d Technical Report]
    53 ||               || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVN''' || '''KVM''' ||
     53||               || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVM''' || '''KVM''' ||
    5454|| '''CUDA'''      ||   ||  ||  ||
    5555|| '''Phoronix Test Suite'''      ||   ||  ||  ||
     56'''vm01 規格''' = 1CPU + 4GB HD + 1GB RAM + 128MB SWAP
    5657
    5758[[BR]]
    … …  
    6364    * (1) Xen is actually pretty damn good[[BR]] (2) KVM performance is sorry with full device emulation (expected)[[BR]] (3) KVM+VirtIO is better, but nowhere near Xen Paravirt
    6465
    65 ||                     || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVN''' || '''KVM''' ||
     66||                     || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVM''' || '''KVM''' ||
    6667|| '''bonnie++'''       ||   ||  ||  ||
    67 || '''dbench''' ||   ||  ||  ||
    68 || '''Phoronix Test Suite'''      ||   ||  ||  ||     
     68|| '''Phoronix Test Suite - dbench'''      || [http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ Test Result (vm01)]  ||  ||  ||     
     69'''vm01 規格''' = 1CPU + 4GB HD + 1GB RAM + 128MB SWAP
    6970
    7071[[BR]]
    … …  
    7475   * [http://vmstudy.blogspot.com/2010/04/network-performance-test-xenkvm-vt-d.html Network Performance Test Xen/Kvm (VT-d and Para-virt drivers)]
    7576     * 此位大大的測試看來，同樣使用 Para-virt + VT-d 的話 Xen 還是勝出
    76 ||               || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVN''' || '''KVM''' ||
     77||               || '''Xen-PV'''  || '''Xen-HVM''' || '''KVM''' ||
    7778||  '''tbench'''     ||   ||  ||  ||
    78 
     79|| '''Phoronix Test Suite'''      ||   ||  ||  ||
     80'''vm01 規格''' = 1CPU + 4GB HD + 1GB RAM + 128MB SWAP
    7981
    8082----