[[PageOutline]] = XEN Web-based Manager = == 1.Introduction == Our GTD-Cloud is done, but it need convenient control mechanism through web (http protocol). We survey two Web-based manager, and choose which is suit for Cloud environment. * [http://trac.enomalism.com/enomalism/ Enomaly ], [wiki:enomaly_ch Enomaly 中文介紹] * [http://www.openqrm.com/ OpenQRM ], [wiki:openqrm_ch OpenQRM中文介紹] [[BR]] == 2. Comparison == || ||Enomaly ||OpenQRM || ||Features || || || ||Host OS ||Centos, RHEL 5.2,Ubuntu 8.04 ||Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Fedora 9 & openSuse || ||Client OS Image || ||Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Fedora 9 & openSuse || ||Hypervisior ||Xen, KVM, Vmware ||VMware, Xen, KVM, Linux-VServer || ||Functions || || || ||i18n (Chinese?) || || || ||License ||AGPL ||GPLv3 || ||Monitoring Tool ||Nagios ||Nagios || ||High-availability ||No ||Supported || ||Virtual Network Manager ||Supported || || ||Amazon EC2 support ||Yes ||No || [[BR]] == 3. Idea == * 目前Survey Enomaly和OpenQRM的結果: * 以功能面來說OpenQRM提供更多的功能(採用plug-able的架構),此外OpenQRM也整合了一些Storage的方案 * 以HA來看,OpenQRM有提供faul-over的機制 * 以控制介面來看,Enomaly的介面較簡單直覺 * 根據我們的需求來看, * 之後會繼續實際安裝和操作來了解其真正的差別 [[BR]] == 4. Reference == * [http://trac.enomalism.com/enomalism/ Enomaly ] * [http://www.openqrm.com/ OpenQRM ] * [http://www.cs.rug.nl/%7Ejurjen/iwi-howtos/linux/OpenQRM-under-Debian-on-AMD64.html OpenQRM-under-Debian-on-AMD64 Howto] - by Jurjen Bokma * [http://wiki.linuxfellaz.net/doku.php?id=blog:howtos:openqrm:webfarm Building a virtualized web-farm with openQRM] == 5. !ScreenCast == * [http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=SJce69EHWx8 Enomalism2 First Look Tour] * [http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=9oBu2W3xRDk Instant Cloud Computing with openQRM]